Skip to main content
Free Tool · Admissions

Free Applicant Comparison Matrix

Rank competing applicants in a side-by-side weighted evaluation grid — score each candidate against structured criteria and generate a ranked shortlist instantly.

Runs entirely in your browser · No login · No data uploaded

Evaluation Details
Evaluation Criteria

No criteria yet. Click Add or load Sample.

Applicants

No applicants yet. Click Add or load Sample.

Add criteria and applicants, then score each applicant to build the comparison matrix.

How to Build an Applicant Comparison Matrix in 3 Steps

Follow these steps to get results in under a minute

01
Define criteria and weights
Add the evaluation criteria your admissions panel uses — academic results, interview score, personal statement, references. Set a weight % for each (targeting 100% total). The weight bar shows your running total.
02
Add applicants and score them
Add each shortlisted applicant with name and ID. For each criterion, enter their score out of 10 in the matrix. Cells colour green (8–10), amber (5–7), or red (1–4) to highlight high and low performers at a glance.
03
Rank and print the shortlist
Click Rank Applicants to see weighted totals and a ranked list from highest to lowest. Print the full comparison matrix and ranked shortlist for committee review and file documentation.

How Applicant Comparison Matrix Compares

vs spreadsheets, manual processes, and paid platforms

Feature UniCloud360 Applicant Comparison Matrix Unstructured Panel DiscussionBasic SpreadsheetPaid CRM Scoring Module
Weighted multi-criteria scoring Auto-weighted totals Subjective only ⚠️ Manual formulas ⚠️ Config required
Side-by-side applicant view All on one screen One at a time ⚠️ Scroll-heavy ⚠️ Separate tabs
Ranked shortlist generation Instant ranking Manual ordering ⚠️ Manual sort ⚠️ Scheduled report
Custom criteria + weights Fully configurable No ⚠️ Preset columns only ⚠️ Admin setup
Print-ready committee report One-click Manual notes ⚠️ Manual format ⚠️ Export only
Cost Free forever ⚠️ Ad-hoc guesswork ⚠️ Effort-intensive Paid system

What Admissions Panels Are Saying

Trusted by lecturers and students across Sri Lankan universities

4.9
★★★★★
4 reviews
SM
Dr. Sarah Mitchell
Admissions Director
★★★★★

"Before this tool, our shortlisting meetings were long debates with no clear structure. Now every panel member scores independently on the matrix, we combine the sheets, and the ranking is objective. Meeting time dropped from 3 hours to 45 minutes."

JO
James Okafor
International Admissions Officer
★★★★★

"The weighted criteria is exactly what we needed. Interview performance is worth 30% while raw academic scores are 25% — the matrix handles this automatically. I can justify every ranking decision with a number, which is crucial for appeals."

PN
Priya Nair
Graduate Programme Coordinator
★★★★★

"The colour-coded scoring cells make it immediately obvious where each applicant is strong or weak across criteria. In 30 seconds looking at the matrix I can see the full picture — no need to read through individual application files."

CR
Carlos Rivera
Scholarship Selection Committee Chair
★★★★☆

"The print output goes into the scholarship committee minutes as an appendix. Having a documented, auditable scoring matrix has made our selection process defensible to external reviewers for the first time."